Pringles Snack Packaging Noise Control
Client: Duke/Fluor Daniel (EPC Contractor) for Procter & Gamble
Location: Jackson, Tennessee, USA
Project Description:
In expanding their popular ‘Pringles’ snack chip product line, Procter &
Gamble developed a unique, single-serve, modular snack packing line at
their Jackson, TN facility. The project involved tailored inventions and
one-of-a-kind process equipment for efficiently packaging the snack
chips into new, custom-made single-serving cups. The project consists of
two separate filling, packaging, and conveying lines which join together
at a palletizer. Following palletization, the pallets are
shrink-wrapped and warehoused for shipment to distributors.
Scope:
Noise Control Engineering: (a) Post-start-up noise reduction
troubleshooting; and (b) noise mitigation alternatives assessment,
ranking, and cost estimation.
Regulatory Involvement and Environmental Documentation:
None; in-house engineering study only.
Noise Control Services:
The project was installed as two separate production lines; each being a
separate phase. With the first phase, both OSHA requirements and P&G
in-house noise goals were met, allowing technicians to work without
hearing projection devices. However, following the installation of
the second line, the noise levels throughout the packaging room
increased from the additional equipment; necessitating a hearing
conservation program. To attempt a return to the preferred,
no-hearing-protection-needed environment, AAC conducted a noise
evaluation to determine the prudent and cost-effective method for
reducing single-serving facility noise levels.
As a first step, AAC engineers made detailed on-site measurements, both
of specific equipment items and of the working environment as a whole.
These measurements helped pin-point the significant, individual noise
sources, as well as defined the reverberant characteristics of the
various operating spaces. Next, a ranked listing of the most troublesome
noise sources was made with several noise reduction alternatives for
each type of source suggested. Finally, the potential reduction for each
technique was estimated to provide P&G with the technical side of a
benefit versus cost analysis and to aid in their implementation
strategy.
During the analyses and evaluations for potential noise reduction
methods, primary issues included ease-of-cleaning (in a food-handling
environment), ease-of-maintenance (to keep the equipment and processes
running), and the overall functionality within the processing system.
Since the equipment must be disassembled and thoroughly cleaned
periodically using chemical solutions and high-pressure water rinses,
several constraints are placed on typical industrial noise control
methods that may otherwise be applicable in non-food industrial
situations. To (a) preclude any foreign material from getting into the
food product, (b) restrict places wherein bacteria/mold/fungi could be
supported, and (c) allow for thorough cleaning using pressurized
caustic cleaning solutions and/or water jets in a food-grade facility,
innovative noise control methods were applied.
The study recommended a stepped noise control implementation program
that would (a) treat some of the sources and (b) modify some of the
propagation paths; all while maintaining the food-grade cleanliness
standards plus having the least effect on the operations and worker
movements within the packaging facility. P&G has begun implementing
these recommended steps, working toward an improved operating
environment in the facility.
|
 |